Disgruntled Democrat Volunteer Returns to Party Headquarters and Destroys Building in Massive Fire

Democrat arsonist Matthew Egler Police arrested a former Democrat volunteer Matthew Egler for torching the Democrat Party headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona on July 24th. Local Democrats blamed the arson on Republicans before the arrest of the disgruntled Democrat Party volunteer. ARREST MADE: 29-year-old Matthew Egler has been arrested in connection with the fire set to…

Source: Disgruntled Democrat Volunteer Returns to Party Headquarters and Destroys Building in Massive Fire

Result of Covid PCR Test Depends On Laboratory?

FAIL: The Exact Same COVID Test will Produce Different Results Depending on the Laboratory

Another failure of the COVID diagnostic test

by Jon Rappoport

In previous articles, I’ve detailed several key reasons why the PCR test is worthless and deceptive. (PCR article archive here).

Here I discuss yet another reason: the uniformity of the test has never been properly validated. Different labs come up with different results.

Let’s start here—the reference is the NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.”

“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”

“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”

“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”

“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”

“There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”

“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”

“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”

“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”

“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”

“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”

—Sobering, to say the least. Of course, some people will claim that since the date of the Times’ article (2007), vast improvements have been made in the PCR test.

Really? The truth is, something much worse is lurking in the weeds. It has been lurking ever since the PCR was approved for use in diagnostics:

No large study validating the uniformity of PCR results, from lab to lab, has ever been done.

You would think at least a dozen very large studies had checked for uniform results, before unleashing the PCR on the public; but no, this was not the case. It is still not the case.

Here is what should have been done decades ago:

Take a thousand volunteers. Remove tissue samples from each person. Send those samples to 30 different labs. Have the labs run PCR and announce their findings for each volunteer.

“We found the following virus in sample 1…” Something simple like that.

Now compare the findings, in each of the 1000 cases, from all 30 labs. Are the findings the same? Are the outcomes uniform all the way across the board?

My money would be against it. Strongly against.

But this is not the end of the process. SEVERAL of these large-scale studies should be done. In EACH study, there are 1000 volunteers and 30 labs.

Why? Because, as you can readily see, the whole story about a current pandemic is riding on those tests. The story, the containment measures, the lockdowns, the economic devastation, the human destruction—it’s all built on the presumption that the PCR is a valid test.

It’s unthinkable that these validation studies of the PCR weren’t done decades ago. But they weren’t. And there is only one reason why: to avoid the truth. The results of the PCR aren’t uniform. They vary from lab to lab.

One lab says positive for virus B. Another lab says negative for virus B. Both labs are looking at the same sample.

No? Couldn’t be? Then prove it with the several large-scale studies I’m proposing.

I’ll give you a rough fictional analogy for the current testing situation—

In an old-growth forest of immense trees, a government agency tests white spots found on some trunks. The verdict? A highly destructive and novel fungus, for which there is no remedy. Without immediate and drastic action, the fungus will spread to the whole forest and destroy all the trees.

So a government contract is signed with a logging company, and workers move in and start cutting down many trees.

Meanwhile, another lab tests those white spots and reports they’re harmless bird droppings. Yet another lab claims they’re a mild traditional fungus of no great concern.

The reports of these two labs are suppressed and censored. The labs are put on a quiet blacklist, and their business dries up.

The tree cutting continues.

An analyst at the US Forestry Service sends a memo to his boss. It details the fact that the test which found deadly fungus is unreliable. Different labs doing the test come up with different and conflicting results.

Worse yet, that test was never properly validated as a uniform process before being approved for use. In other words, no one did a large study in which multiple labs used the test to determine the composition of spots found on trees. No one made sure that all labs came to the same conclusions using the test.

The Forestry analyst writes:

“The test has inherent flaws. Different labs examining the same sample will always come up with different results. This has disastrous consequences in the real world. You can see that now; we are cutting down half a forest to prevent the spread of a fungus which has been noticed for centuries, and never caused serious harm…”

The analyst is fired from his job and firmly reminded that he signed a non-disclosure agreement, and he better keep his mouth shut.

The tree-cutting goes on. A developer buys up the cleared land at a very low price…

In essence, the pipeline of information from actually reliable sources, to the government, and then to the public, is narrowed, and guarded against unwelcome intrusions of TRUTH.

In the case of the PCR test, that’s what is happening.

America is Led by Murderers? There is What Can Citizens Do

Dr. Anthony Fauci is employed by the United States government in the National Institute of Health. He is not an elected official, and has been in office for 38 years during the tenure of 6 presidents, and probably has more power than the Office of the President of the United States. Is he “untouchable?”

Commentary by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

There is overwhelming evidence that Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, is guilty of mass murder.

Earning huge profits from the pharmaceutical industry, he has been the main leader in the United States controlling the Coronavirus response, which has included squelching public information about hydroxychloroquine, a safe FDA-approved drug which has been in the market for decades, and which thousands of doctors are now saying has a 100% cure rate for patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

This action alone has led to tens of thousands of needless deaths, as well as billions of taxpayer dollars spent on “new” cures for COVID-19, such as the very profitable Remdesivir, and the upcoming COVID vaccines.

He seems to wield more power and influence than even the President of the United States.

So is there no way to stop him or bring him to justice?

American Citizens vs. the Wall Street Central Bankers

What Dr. Fauci and others like him who are complicit in mass murder has is unlimited financial resources, as he is part of the Wall Street Central Bankers who pretty much control the affairs of the world through International organizations such as the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, the Council on Foreign Relations, and many other organizations that are linked to Central Bankers.

What allows this small group of Billionaires to control the affairs of the world and get away with mass murder is not their wealth, however, but a compliant and non-resistant citizenry.

An uprising among the “common folk” is what they fear most, because the “common folk” outnumber them significantly, and it would not even take a majority of the “common folk” to overthrow their power.

They use subtle mind-control techniques to control narratives, and they also use the media, and especially today in the 21st Century, they use Big Tech to squelch freedom of thought and expression.

They keep the masses fighting each other instead of them, by creating political and social divisions that the masses in large part do not even understand originate from this small group of wealthy people.

And when you get to the top of the power structure of these people, you will see they are not very nice people at all. They are very evil. They are Satanists who are involved in the Occult and they are pedophiles and murderers. To learn more about this, see:

Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order

What Can Citizens Do?

The political system in the U.S. is thoroughly corrupt. Our Constitutional principles, originally drafted and implemented to protect citizens against the over-reach of a tyrannical government, pretty much died in 1913 when the Federal Reserve Bank was setup to control the monetary system.

Bankers and Wall Street have pretty much ruled the nation ever since then. They control the Presidency, the Congress, and the Supreme Court.

Here are a couple of suggestions I have today, here in July of 2020, of how citizens could potentially take back the country away from the powerful bankers and Wall Street.

The Grand Jury

One of the provisions of the Constitution that is supposed to give the citizens of the United States access to justice, apart from the three branches of the government, is the Grand Jury.

Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, has been one of the main proponents of citizens’ grand juries in recent years. He has a website here devoted to the topic.

Writing for Newsmax.com in 2018, he explained:

There is only one way that the nation will restore itself to equal justice under the law, as it was designed on July 4, 1776, in my birthplace of Philadelphia.

In this regard, We the People must now take a page from the “Old West,” before there was any U.S. Department of Justice, and implement citizens’ grand juries, citizens’ trials, and legal citizens law enforcement.

In this regard, our venerable and regrettably now deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the landmark case of United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1992), that the grand jury under our Constitution does not belong to any of the three branches of government, but instead to We the People.

As a result, the citizenry are empowered to empanel grand juries, indict, try, convict and mete out sentences for those accused of crimes.

He goes on to explain how he previously put this law to practice in Ocala, Florida:

A few years ago, I, as the prosecutor and a Florida lawyer, empaneled a citizens’ grand jury in Ocala, Florida, …picked the jurors randomly from voter rolls as is done by federal and state courts, and advised the accused, in this case Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama of the proceeding and offered to allow them to testify, and then presented evidence to the citizens grand jury when they did not appear.

As a result they were indicted for alleged crimes concerning their manifest harm to national security over Iran which not coincidentally involved leaking classified information about our cyber-attack on Iranian nuclear reactors. This classified information was illegally leaked to bolster Obama’s and Clinton’s political fortunes.

A trial then ensued, presided over by a neutral judge picked from the Ocala community, and Clinton and Obama were convicted of crimes. At the time, we did not seek to enforce the convictions. (Source.)

I am not sure that trying and convicting politicians is the best route to go in using a citizen grand jury, however, when it is Wall Street Bankers who are mostly responsible for these crimes against the American people. I would prefer citizen grand juries to be non-partisan politically. And instead of trying politicians, let’s try Wall Street executives who always buy their freedom and avoid justice. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates would be two good examples to start with.

Also, if this method were to be employed today against those enforcing the COVID response, enforcement of convictions would be necessary as well.

This would probably involve a Civil War, as most of the armament in the U.S. is controlled by the Government, and there would need to be enough defectors to participate in Civil Disobedience. But I believe there are enough good people in the military and in law enforcement who could make a difference if they defected.

But for those who are not spoon-fed the propaganda from the corporate media with the dissenting voices being squelched by Big Tech, it is obvious that we are already in a Civil War. Some people are just confused about the “sides.”

It is not a war between liberals and conservatives, or the Left versus the Right, or white versus black, but the average citizens against the Wall Street Bankers.

Anthony Fauci, for example, whom I believe should be one of the first persons tried by a citizen grand jury since he is on the public payroll, has served both Republican and Democratic politicians.

Massive Civil Disobedience – A Call for Big Tech Employees to Become Whistleblowers

Politicians have been used by the billionaires on Wall Street, most of whom are part of the pharmaceutical industry, to order Americans to stay home so that they can destroy the economy and transfer TRILLIONS to themselves.

It is well established now that the lock downs have caused more illness and deaths than “the virus.”

But what if the tables were turned?

Everything the tyrants use to achieve their goals is dependent upon others to fall in line.

The Big Tech executives, for example, just appeared before Congress yesterday. But what will be the result? Probably nothing. After all, the members of Congress for the most part work for these Wall Street Billionaires!

We have seen the effects of how just a few dissenters and whistleblowers can have a massive influence on the public. We saw it this week with the Frontline Doctors who came to Washington D.C. and held press conferences and seminars to expose the truth.

Censorship for the most part did not work, because enough people were dedicated to keeping their message alive and distributing it to as many people as possible.

These doctors are being attacked by the Globalists now, just as they have done to every other whistleblower who has come forward to share the truth. Dr. Judy Mikovits is another example of someone who has put everything on the line to share the truth, as are Julian Assange and Edward Snowden in recent years, who are treated as criminals instead of whistleblowers who brought the truth about corruption to the masses.

The Big Tech companies have a huge number of employees, and if you work for Facebook, Google, or Twitter, you are complicit with the crimes committed by your employer.

If any of you want to come forward as anonymous whistleblowers, you are welcome to contact Health Impact News. And if enough employees decide they are not going to participate in these crimes any longer, they have the power to cripple the operations of these evil companies, if they value freedom, the truth, and human life more than they value their paycheck, and devise a plan to work together from the inside.

I am not claiming that any of these actions are the correct path to take, but it is time to start thinking and discussing these kinds of things. If you are still holding out hope that a politician or the political process can somehow turn all this around, you are not living in reality any more.

The war is between the masses and the Global Wall Street bankers, and we have no chance of success if we continue to fight among ourselves, not truly recognizing who the real enemy is.

We need to set aside our political and religious differences, and unite for a common cause of liberty, truth, and the value of human life. We must not succumb to fear, but press on in faith that good will triumph over evil, that God will triumph over the Devil.

Because if we fail, murderers will continue to run this country, and we have not seen the worst yet.

Turkey’s Brain Drain: Youths See No Future There

SODEV, another pollster, found that 60.5% of youths supporting Erdoğan said they would prefer to live in Christian Switzerland with half the salary they would have earned in Muslim Saudi Arabia. ‘These kind of social engineering efforts targeting the

Source: Turkey’s Brain Drain: Why Youths See No Future There